Tortious Interference Attorney in Tennessee

There are really two torts here, and they are not the same case. Interference with an existing contract is one; interference with a prospective economic advantage — a relationship that had not yet become a contract — is the other, and each has its own elements. The work runs plaintiff-side for a business harmed by a competitor's or former employee's conduct, and defense-side when one of these theories has been threatened or filed. The usual fact patterns are a former employee soliciting clients against a restrictive covenant, a competitor inducing a breach of a vendor or customer contract, and a recruitment campaign that went past hard competition into interference.

Tortious-interference claims rarely arrive alone. Tennessee recognizes both interference with contract and interference with prospective business relationships, and in practice they ride alongside non-compete and non-solicit claims, because the same conduct that breaks a covenant often interferes with the relationships the covenant protected. That overlap cuts both ways — it can strengthen a claim or expose a weak one — and whether injunctive relief is realistically on the table depends on the evidence preserved early: the communications, the calendars, the timing of the customer departures.

Statewide advice; trial representation in Sumner, Wilson, Robertson, Trousdale, Williamson, and Davidson Counties.

Use the form below to schedule a consultation. Do not include confidential details in the form. The office will respond with instructions for sending case documents securely.